Work Place Conflict
Scenario:
“You are a department manager in a
mid-sized company that provides technology support services. You have ten
employees who are required to maintain a high level of technical expertise and
deliver excellent customer service. One of your employees, who has been
with the company for two years, is performing at a substandard level and you
have received numerous complaints from customers and coworkers. In
addition, this employee has displayed confrontational behavior which has
created a hostile environment. You must now meet with this employee and
deliver an ultimatum regarding the need for immediate improvement or
dismissal.”
Now this would be my honest response
to the question:
When
I first realize that I have to have an immediate meeting about improvement of
dismissal I would I would take a look at their personal performance. I would take them to the side first; to place
where they would feel free from work and just talk to them about life and catch
up with them personally. During that
first encounter I would try and gauge the mental toughness of them from outside
of the workplace. This first meeting
would only be for my personal side to think it through so I could have a place
to resonate from mentally. I would then
access if I need to tell them what is going on and tell them that they should
try and pick up the pace and not let whatever is affecting their performance go
and if they needed any help then my door is always open. I personally would not say that but it just
sounds like the proper office procedure to say it. I would say to them do not worry about it I
understand that you are going through things and that it may be affecting you
here at work, but you have to think about one thing; and I would ask them this
question. “If your job was affecting you
so much that it was messing up your home life should your family have the right
to find out why?” I would then leave
them with that and give it a day or two time to allow for the talk to permeate
not just their thought process but their workflow and home life process.
Being
that there is a serious problem that really needs my addressing, I would be
able to talk to them and then I would be curious about their response. I would believe they would say that nothing
is going on and that I have been off my game lately because of family
problems. I would anticipate the worst because,
I have learned that hoping for the best is something that comes far and
few. I would hope that they would be
totally honest with me, but if not then at least half way. I think that me bringing them into my office
2 days after we had a personal talk would catch them off guard and would at
least warrant them an honest response; knowing they had no time to
prepare. I would then tell them that
they need to make a change and get back to what I used to admire about them,
and that they are like everybody; having a rough patch.
I would use the
collaboration technique because I would be able to ask them about how the
action plan we are going to set up would help them best. I would set up times that would require us to
talk two times a week for the first two weeks, and then one time a week for the
nest three weeks. I would use this as my
collaborative technique because to me this would be a win win situation. Collaboration invites
the other party’s perspective, ideas, input, and suggestions, so that a
resolution, that is to the mutual benefit of both parties, might be
reached (Wilmot & Locker, 2007). I
would use this because knowing how to approach someone is key when correcting
them. If they are not susceptible to the
change you think should be invoked then your chances are as good as a jack
rabbit killing a lion. I think that when
work place conflicts are to be confronted that they should be equally talked
about and equally discussed in the sense of problem solving. Only allowing one side to make the decisions
does not make for a great workplace environment, but for the an environment of
dictatorship.
References
Locker, Kitty O. (2002). Business
and administrative communications. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
No comments:
Post a Comment